IAN CURRYER OF NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL
I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING YOUR COUNCIL ON CURRENT MATTERS FOR OVER A YEAR FOR THE RIGHTS OF A 12 YEAR OLD BOY WHO CAME INTO LOCAL AUTHORITY CARE UNDER THE MATRIMONIAL ACT OF 1958 WHERE YOUR PREDECESSOR COUNCIL HAD A DUTY OF CARE , THIS WOULD IN LAW WOULD HAVE BEEN A LEGAL ENTITLEMENT , MY RIGHTS AS THAT 12 YEAR OLD BOY WERE VIOLATED BY YOUR PREDECESSORS ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS , AND IN RECENT TIMES IN FIGHTING TO UPHOLD THE RIGHTS TO HAVE JUSTICE FOR THAT CHILD THE FIGHT DOES NOT MERELY START LAST YEAR IT GOES BACK TO 2003 WHEN I FIRST WENT FIRSTLY TO NOTTINGHAM POLICE WITH THE ALLEGATIONS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION , I ALSO REPORTED THE CURRENT ALLEGATIONS TO YOUR CURRENT SOCIAL SERVICES AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF THE 2003 CASE NOT ONCE BUT NUMEROUS TIMES ON A WEEKLY BASIS OVER A FIVE OR SIX WEEK PERIOD AND WAS CONSTANTLY TOLD SOMEONE WOULD GET BACK TO ME , BUT NO ONE EVER DID , WHICH IS A RECURRING SITUATION WITH YOUR COUNCIL AS YOU PERSONALLY ARE AWARE OF FOLLOWING THE 24 CALLS MADE TO YOUR HOME AT 7 HUNTER ST THE MEADOWS NOTTINGHAM , IT WAS ON THAT 24TH CALL MADE FROM MY FORMER HOME IN ROCHESTER NEW YORK THAT I SPOKE TO YOU LAST YEAR AND YOU GOT ME IN TOUCH WITH IAN CURRYER AFTER A SIMILAR RUNAROUND OF BEING PASSED FROM STAFF MEMBER TO STAFF MEMBER , MY BELIEF WHICH IS THE BELIEF OF MY FAMILY FRIENDS AND SUPPORTERS IS THAT THIS IS A COMMON PRACTICE BY NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL TO TRY TO DETER ME FROM GOING FORWARD WITH MY ALLEGATIONS AGAINST YOUR COUNCIL AND IN SOME QUARTERS INCLUDING MINE IT IS VIEWED AS A CONTINUANCE OF THE ABUSES OF THAT 12 YEAR OLD CHILD.
TO MAKE YOU FULLY AWARE OF THE ATTEMPTS AT A COVER UP I’M CURRENTLY ENGAGED IN FIGHTING YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE 12 YEAR OLD CHILD EVEN TODAY NEEDS TO BE HEARD AND AS A 60 YEAR OLD MAN STILL TRAUMATISED BY SURVIVORS GUILT AND POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER I’M GOING ALL OUT FOR JUSTICE FOR THAT LITTLE BOY.
FIRSTLY I’M NOT GOING TO BE BULLIED AND HUMILIATED FURTHER BY ANY OF YOUR PERSONAL SECRETARIES OR STAFF BY MEANS OF HAVING CALLS TERMINATED AS THEY WERE LAST YEAR NOR AM I GOING TO LISTEN TO YOUR DENIALS THAT NONE OF MY CALLS TO SPEAK PERSONALLY WITH YOU EVER HAPPENED AS I HAVE IN MY POSSESSION A VIDEO OF ONE SUCH CALL WHICH IS EVIDENCE ALONE THAT YOUR COUNCIL EMPLOYEES USE BULLY TACTICS TO SILENCE PEOPLE IN THE HOPE THAT THEY WILL GIVE UP AND MELT AWAY , THAT’S NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN A FACT I WISH TO MAKE YOU FULLY AWARE OF.
I HAVE DEMANDED LYNNE NORTH ENGAGES YOU AS THE ACCOUNTABLE PERSON TO FULLY INVESTIGATE THIS COMPLAINT BECAUSE PREVIOUS COMPLAINTS THAT WERE FULLY JUSTIFIED HAVE NEVER BEEN UPHELD A FURTHER WHITEWASH SWEPT UNDER THE CARPET WAY OF DEALING WITH GENUINE ISSUES WHICH I TOTALLY RESENT.
AS THAT 12 YEAR OLD CHILD I HAD THE RIGHTS THAT A RECORD OF MY TIME IN CARE WOULD BE KEPT SAFE FOR ACCESS SHOULD I EVER REQUEST THEM THOSE RIGHTS FOR THAT 12 YEAR OLD CHILD HAVE BEEN VIOLATED BY THE ALLEGED DESTRUCTION OF MY CHILD CARE RECORDS
AT THIS POINT IN TIME I’M BRANDING IN CURRYER AS A SUPERCILLIOUS PERSON NOT FIT TO SERVE IN PUBLIC OFFICE REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE OF NOTTINGHAM LET ALONE BE THE ONE DEEMED FIT TO UPHOLD MY RIGHTS IN THE CURRENT CLIMATE OF A MAJOR INVESTIGATION INTO THE ABUSES IN ESTABLISHMENTS RAN BY YOUR PREDECESSOR COUNCIL THE FORMER NOTTINGHAM CORPORATION I’M FURTHER BRANDING HIM AS A LIAR AS HIS ACTIONS VIA HIS LIES LEAVE ME FEELING ONCE AGAIN LIKE THAT CHILD BEING ABUSED ALL OVER AGAIN AND AGAIN .
THE CURRENT HISTORY FOLLOWING THE ALLEGED DESTRUCTION OF MY CHILD CARE SOCIAL FILE HAS LEFT ME TRAUMATISED BEYOND BELIEF BUT REGARDLESS OF THAT FACT I HAVE PURSUED OTHER WAYS TO PLACE MYSELF IN YOUR ESTABLISHMENTS AT THE TIMEFRAME OF MY ALLEGATIONS TO BE TOLD BY MR CURRYER AND DORNE COLLINSON WHO HAS SINCE LEFT NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL , SOME OF THESE RESPONSES ARE CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED AS ONE OF THE RESPONSES FROM MR CURRYER WAS THAT AFTER A REQUEST FOR REGISTERS OF ADMISSIONS TO YOUR ESTABLISMENTS THAT NO SUCH REGISTERS EVER EXISTED THIS WAS TOLD TO THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE AS WELL AS MYSELF AND IN ORDER TO HAVE A FULL UNBIASED INVESTIGATION INTO MY COMPLAINT I AM REQUESTING THAT YOU UNDERTAKE TO TAKE STATEMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS THAT THIS WAS STATED TO AS I AM NOW IN POSSESSION OF PAGE 48 OF THE BEECHWOOD ADMISSIONS REGISTER WHICH MAKES A LIAR OUT OF THE MAN I I VIEW AS NOT FIT TO SERVE IN PUBLIC OFFICE
THE PEOPLE I WANT STATEMENTS TAKEN FROM TO FACILITATE A FULL INVESTIGATION ARE THE FOLLOWING AS A FULL AND IMPARTIAL INVESTIGATION INTO THIS NEEDS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY YOU AS THE ELECTED LEADER OF NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL.
1 GRAHAM HOLDEN
2 TREVOR HARTLEY
3 MICHAEL CLARK
4 IAN JOHNSON
5 DIANE HAWLEY
6 SANDRA HOLLAND
7 DOUGLAS HOLLAND
8 CHRIS GUEST
9 LOUISE MANN
10 TOM KING
11 ROSIE BERRY
MR CURRYER WOULD I’M SURE SUGGEST TO YOU THAT I MAY HAVE SELECTIVE HEARING POSSIBLY TO DEFLECT HIS OWN ATTEMPTS TO SILENCE ME BUT I WORK ON THE PRINCIPLE THAT IF ITS SELECTIVELY HEARD BY ONE PERSON IE; MYSELF IT COULD BE DISMISSED , IF HEARD BY TWO IT COULD BE DEEMED A COINCIDENCE BUT WE ARE TALKING A MINIMUM OF TWELVE INCLUDING MYSELF
I REFUSE TO BE A VICTIM OF AN ONGOING SET OF UNEXPLAINED CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH IS WHY WE ARE AT THE POSITION WE CURRENTLY ARE ENGAGED IN.
BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT MY SOCIAL CARE FILES ARE MISSING I AM IN NEED OF TRYING TO FIND CORROBORATING WITNESSES WHO COULD EVEN BE VICTIMS THEMSELVES AT ESTABLISHMENTS YOUR COUNCIL REFUSE TO PUBLICLY DECLARE AS PART OF THE INVESTIGATION THIS COULD BE FACILITATED VIA A RENEWED MEDIA APPEAL VIA THE NOTTINGHAM POST
THE ESTABLISHMENTS THAT AT FIRST WERE DENIED AS ANYTHING TO DO WITH NOTTINGHAM COUNCIL BY DORNE COLLINSON ARE HAZELWOOD CHILDRENS HOME FOREST GROVE NOTTINGHAM AND ASHLEY HOUSE REMAND HOME IN WORKSOP NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
THE CURRENT MEDIA STATEMENT IS STILL THAT OF THE STATEMENT MADE IN 2011 THAT IT INVOLVES CONSTANT REPEATS OF MINIMISING THE TRUTH BY REITTERATING IT INVOLVES THE FOLLOWING TAKEN FROM A RECENT REPORT FROM THE NOTTINGHAM POST
“Bracken House, Bulwell; Ranskill Gardens, Top Valley; Wood Nook, Beechdale, and Risley Hall, Derbyshire.
AS SUCH I AM TOTALLY OUTRAGED AS A VICTIM FROM THE ONGOING INVESTIGATION AND OVER THE PAST YEAR I HAVE CONSTANTLY TRIED TO HAVE NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL RUN A FRESH MEDIA APPEAL AND IN DOING SO FINALLY TELL THE TRUTH AND GIVE THE THE VICTIMS AND THE PEOPLE OF NOTTINGHAM A SENSE OF BELIEF THAT THIS INVESTIGATION IS BEING TAKEN VERY SERIOUSLY BY YOURSELVES.
THE FACTS SURROUNDING THESE REQUESTS TO MR CURRYER HAVE BEEN REFUSED BY MEANS OF THE FOLLOWING LIES
1.HE TOLD ME THAT OPERATION DAYBREAK HAD PLACED INSTRUCTIONS THAT THERE WERE TO BE NO COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE MEDIA TO ALSO INCLUDE ANY POTENTIAL FOR A FRESH MEDIA APPEAL FOR VICTIMS AND OR WITNESSES
I PERSONALLY CONTACTED MY POLICE LIASON OFFICER DET DONNY SUBAN (OPERATION DAYBREAK) AS A HOSTILE ANGRY AND OUTRAGED PERSON AS THE POLICE ARE SUPPOSEDLY MEANT TO DO ANYTHING TO COLLATE EVIDENCE INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF BRINGING FORWARD OTHERS INTO THIS INVESTIGATION , AFTER A DAY OR TWO HE CAME BACK TO ME TO TOTALLY REFUTE WHAT MR CURRYER HAD TOLD ME STATING THEY HAVE NO DIRECTIVES IN PLACE AS SUGGESTED BY MR CURRYER
MR IAN CURRYER THEN SUGGESTED DONNY SUBAN MAY HAVE IT WRONG AS IT WOULD BE YVONNE DALES THE SENIOR OFFICER AT OPERATION DAYBREAK , SO ONCE AGAIN I CONTACT OPERATION DAYBREAK AND AFTER INITIAL CONTACT WITH W DET SGT MURDOCH I SPOKE WITH YVONNE DALES WHO STATED THE SAME FACTS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN TO ME ,
MR CURRYER THEN SUGGESTED IT WAS NOTTS POLICE AS A WHOLE SO UNDETERRED I CONTACTED CHIEF CONSTABLE CHRIS EYRES OFFICE AND SPOKE TO THE P.A. TO THE CHIEF CONSTABLE WHO MADE ENQUIRIES TO ASCERTAIN THE SITUATION FROM A POLICE VIEWPOINT , ONCE AGAIN AS BEFORE I GOT THE SAME RESPONSE EXCEPT FOR THE P.A. REFERRED ME TO THEIR PRESS OFFICE WHO ALSO REFUTED THE RESPONSES TO ME FROM MR CURRYER
I’VE PUT THESE POLICE RESPONSES BACK TO MR CURRYER AFTER EACH INDIVIDUAL RESPONSE FROM THE POLICE AND GOT TO THE POINT OF FURTHER LIES THAT MATTERS ARE BETWEEN YOUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND THE INDEMNITY INSURERS WHICH WAS MR CURRYERS LAST RESPONSE ON THIS MATTER
FURTHER OUTRAGED AT THIS BUT ON A SEPERATE PROTEST IN PERSON AT LOXLEY HOUSE IN PERSON AFTER MY RETURN TO THE UK FROM MY NEW YORK HOME I DEMANDED TO FIRSTLY SPEAK WITH YOU ABOUT MY CONCERNS AND SENSE OF OUTRAGE , I WAS TOLD YOU WERE UNAVAILABLE DUE TO THE FACT THAT YOU WOULD BE TAKING YOUR WEEKLY SURGERY AT ST ANNS LIBRARY , PRESENT AT THAT TIME WERE DIANE HAWLEY CHRIS GUEST AND LOUISE MANN , IN YOUR UNAVAILABILITY I DEMANDED THAT A CORPORATE DIRECTOR BE SUMMONED AND THAT REQUEST WA MET WITH THE ARRIVAL OF GLEN O’CONNELL WHO INTRODUCED HIMSELF AS DIRECTOR OF LEGAL SERVICES/AFFAIRS THE FOLLOWING CONVERSTION REVOLVED AROUND THE SAME REQUESTS FOR A FRESH MEDIA APPEAL WHICH WAS REFUSED BY YOUR MR O’CONNELL ON THE GROUNDS THAT IT VIOLATED DEMANDS AND GUIDELINES GIVEN BY NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCILS INDEMNITY INSURERS , IT’ SINCE BEEN SAID THAT THIS IS TO FACILITATE AND LIMIT COMPENSATION CLAIMS AGAINST YOURSELVES AND THE INSURANCE COMPANIES.
I DID AFTER THAT MEETING WITH MR O’CONNELL TRAVEL TO ST ANNS LIBRARY TO YOUR LOCAL COUNCIL SURGERY , YOU NEVER ATTENDED AND WE BELIEVE THIS TO BE A FURTHER ATTEMPT TO NOT ENGAGE IN DIALOGUE WITH ME .
ON JUNE 9TH I MET WITH YOUR ALISON MICHALSKA ANTHONY MAY AND STEVE EDWARDS OF THE COUNTY COUNCIL ALONG WITH SOME OF MY FAMILY SUPPORT WHOM I’M MORE THAN HAPPY TO PROVIDE YOU WITH A LIST OF , AS PART OF THE ENSUING DIALOGUE THE SUBJECT OF A FRESH MEDIA APPEAL WAS RAISED AS A MEANS TO DO WHAT THE INTENT IS FOR TO RAISE THE PROFILE TO POENTIALLY BRING FORWARD MORE VICTIMS AND MAYBE WITNESSES ON THE BASIS THAT PEOPLE READING THE REPORTED MEDIA POSTS ARE MISLED BY Bracken House, Bulwell; Ranskill Gardens, Top Valley; Wood Nook, Beechdale, and Risley Hall, Derbyshire.AND WOULD IM SURE THINK THE VENUES NAMED DO NOT INCLUDE THOSE WHERE THEY WERE AND WOULD THEREFORE IGNORE ANY REPORTS
IT IS A SERIOUS SITUATION WHERE I HAVE TO CHALLENGE YOUR COUNCILS LIES TIME AFTER TIME AND IN VERY RECENT TIMES I HAVE UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT GOT FROM YOUR COLLEAGUE THE DETAILS OF YOUR INSURERS AND HAVE BEEN IN PERSONAL DIALOGUE WITH THE INSURERS WHO DENY MR O’CONNELLS SUGGESTION THAT A MEDIA GAGGING ORDER IS IN PLACE , THIS IS VIEWED IN MY CIRCLES AS BLATANT OBSTRUCTION TO JUSTICE AND POTENTIALLY PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE BY CONSTANT OBSTACLES PLACED IN MY WAY IN WHAT I STATE IS A COVER UP OF MONSTEROUS PROPORTIONS.
NOTWITHSTANDING A FURTHER COMMENT OF MR O’CONNELLS RESPONSES THAT THERE CAN BE NO COMMENTS OUTSIDE OF HIS LIES AT WHAT HE SAYS THE INSURERS SAY IS THE STATEMENT THAT BECAUSE OF LITIGATION NO COMMENT CAN BE MADE.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON ME PERSONALLY THERE IS NO CURRENT LITIGATION SO ONCE AGAIN WE ARE INTO THE REALMS OF YOUR COUNCIL FURTHER VIOLATING MY RIGHTS TO ATTEMPT TO FINALLY GET JUSTICE
I AM CURRENTLY WORKING ON MY CHRONOLOGY WITH ALISON MICHALSKA , GEMMA POULTER AND YVONNE WRIGHT AND AS SUCH HAVE SEVERAL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION ON ME PENDING FROM SEVERAL AGENCIES AND A FRESH MEDIA APPEAL IT WOULD GREATLY ASSIST MY PERSONAL CASE WERE A FRESH MEDIA APPEAL BE MADE , AT THE MINIMUM THIS SHOULD INCLUDE HAZELWOOD AND ASHLEY HOUSE , I WAIVED MY RIGHTS TO MEDIA ANONIMITY SO A GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD IS MOST DEFINITELY NOT A FURTHER EXCUSE AVAILABLE TO BE USED TO FURTHER DEFLECT THE ISSUES RAISED
I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH YOU OR YOUR COUNTERPARTS USING MY IDENTITY IN ANY MEDIA APPEALS
IN THE CURRENT CLIMATE IT’S DAMNING INDICTMENT THAT I AM VIEWED AS STILL BEING ABUSED BY YOUR COUNCIL SINCE BECOMING INVOLVED IN THIS INVESTIGATION , I HAVE DEMANDED THAT THIS COMPLAINT BE HANDLED BY YOU PERSONALLY , YOU ARE AN ELECTED COUNCILLOR AND THE BUCK STOPS WITH YOU
PREVIOUS COMPLAINTS HAVE ALL FAILED TO BE UPHELD INCLUDING BEING ABUSED BY ANDREW GOODFELLOW-SWAAP AND ANOTHER COMPLAINT CONCERNING MR CURRYER WHERE HE TRIED TO RENEGE ON AN AGREEMENT TO MEET WITH ME SHOULD I RETURN TO THE UK FROM NEW YORK , THREATS OF LEGAL MATTERS OVER BREECH OF PROMISE / CONTRACT ACTUALLY MADE THE MEETING WITH HIM HAPPEN BUT AS A PARTING SNIPE AT ME HE INDICATED I MAY HAVE MISINTERPRETATED HIS INTENT TO MEET WITH ME
A CARBON COPY OF THIS WILL BE SENT TO THE INSURERS AS PART OF MY COMPLAINTS PROCEDURES I AM CURRENTLY ENGAGED IN
AS DISCUSSED WITH LYNNE NORTH I INITIALLY WANTED AN EXPLANITARY LETTER SENT TO GRAHAM ALLEN MP
I WISH LYNNE NORTH TO SEND THAT SAME LETTER TO NOTTINGHAM MP JOHN MANN AND CRIME COMMISSIONER PADDY TIPPING AND THE CHILDRENS MINISTER AT PARLIAMENT
IN CLOSING I WILL REMIND YOU OF FACTS MR CURRYER IS ALL TO WELL AWARE OF , THE 2003 CALLS TO YOUR SOCIAL SERVICES WHICH HE TOLD ME WOULD HAVE BEEN RECORDED CALLS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN LOGGED , NONE OF THESE RECORDINGS ARE AVAILABLE , ASK YOURSELF WHY ?
AS FOR THE POLICE FAILINGS IN 2003 NOTTINGHAM MP GRAHAM ALLEN AND CRIME COMMISSIONER PADDY TIPPING ARE IN THE LOOP OF ONGOING FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE CORRUPTION OF NOTTS POLICE IN THESE CONTINUED MATTERS AND THE CURRENT SITUATION IS THAT THE POLICE MATTER IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF THE IPCC REF;CO/31714
I’M MORE THAN HAPPY TO DO ALL OF THIS IN THE PUBLIC ARENA MORE SO IN THE CURRENT CLIMATE AROUND HISTORIC SEXUAL ABUSES AND WILL UTILISE EVERY MEDIA RESOURCE AVAILABLE TO ME TO EXPOSE YOUR COUNCIL FOR WHAT I BELIEVE YOU REALLY ARE .
I HAVE A REASONABLE HOPE THAT YOU WILL FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THIS INCLUDING TAKING WITNESS STATEMENTS
MICHAEL SUMMERS